Accessibility remediation

Make the important journeys easier to use, then prove what changed.

We combine automated evidence with manual keyboard, form, structure and user-journey checks. Confirmed barriers become concrete implementation tasks, followed by re-testing and an accessibility statement that reflects the work actually performed.

Review

Automation catches patterns. People catch usability.

We inspect headings, labels, names, image alternatives, language, focus, keyboard behavior, zoom/reflow, error handling and critical flows. Automated results are treated as evidence to validate, not proof of full conformance.

Finished output

What the remediation sprint delivers

  • Prioritized accessibility findings
  • Manual spot checks on critical journeys
  • Code/content remediation within scope
  • Before/after evidence and re-test
  • Known limitations and third-party dependencies
  • Finished accessibility statement
  • Maintenance triggers for future releases
Good target

WCAG 2.2-informed implementation.

WCAG 2.2 is the current W3C Recommendation and provides testable success criteria for web accessibility. A technical service should still avoid claiming full conformance without the evidence to support it.

Human implementation available

Accessibility issue in a form, menu or checkout?

Send us the page and the user journey. We can validate the barrier and scope the fix.